{"id":67989,"date":"2022-09-02T14:11:38","date_gmt":"2022-09-02T21:11:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/moneyppl.com\/?p=67989"},"modified":"2023-02-17T00:57:58","modified_gmt":"2023-02-17T07:57:58","slug":"how-hbo-can-save-or-trash-game-of-thrones-with-house-of-the-dragon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dev.moneyppl.com\/how-hbo-can-save-or-trash-game-of-thrones-with-house-of-the-dragon\/67989\/","title":{"rendered":"How HBO Can Save (Or Trash) Game Of Thrones With ‘House Of The Dragon’"},"content":{"rendered":"
HBO’s Game of Thrones remains one of the most influential shows in television history. It changed the scope of what is possible on the small screen. But it also served as lessons on what not to do as it concluded. The show lost many fans<\/a> who hated the ending. Three years after what many fans declared a colossal failure, there is now a new series in the same universe called House of the Dragon.<\/p>\n HBO believes this will bring back viewers and earn them a fortune, and they may just be right about it. However, there are many reasons why it could save or trash the Game of Thrones universe. Today, we’ll look at how they can make or break George R.R. Martin’s creation. Please note that there are many spoilers from both series throughout this article, so be forewarned before you read on ahead.<\/p>\n These days, GOT source material creator George R.R. Martin isn’t the fan darling that he once was. Many of them resent the fact that the 70-year-old failed to finish his books<\/a>. They understood that the TV show would overtake him but his productivity is lower than a college<\/a> dropout.<\/p>\n Martin appears to be very happy doing everything except finishing A Song of Ice and Fire. It infuriated fans when Fire and Blood emerged because they wanted him to focus on the main saga. They think that he wrote himself into a hole and is happy to take the studio money (via Paste Magazine<\/a>).<\/p>\n HBO allegedly spent $100 million on marketing for the new series but it remains to be seen if was effective. Remember, that decreasing numbers of people are tuning into cable TV so they won’t advertisements. If somebody spends their life<\/a> watching Netflix or Amazon Prime, they won’t see HBO’s new projects.<\/p>\n That’s one of the reasons why Succession failed to attract a massive audience despite becoming a critical darling. There are questions over whether HBO used that $100 million in the right way to attract a new audience. They can’t rely on the people they betrayed by failing to end Game of Thrones on a high note (via Hype Note<\/a>).<\/p>\n Fear of missing out syndrome is another big reason why people<\/a> won’t skip House of the Dragon. It may not be as big of a moment as the original Game of Thrones series because this changed the scope of fantasy. However, it remains event TV and fans won’t be able to help themselves.<\/p>\n The question is whether or not they will pay to watch the show. We’ll talk more about that later but the reality<\/a> is that viewers will tune in and discuss it. But they must secure their loyalty quickly and make them believe that it’s worth committing to (via Inverse<\/a>).<\/p>\n One of the main reasons why the new show should be a success<\/a> is that HBO believes in its product. TV executives are extremely greedy but they’re not stupid<\/a>. They know that it’s a bad idea to pour millions of dollars into a show that won’t yield a profit (via E-News<\/a>).<\/p>\n This isn’t the most glamorous or fun reason on this list but it’s a crucial point. At the end of the day, business<\/a> is the name of the game and HBO is risking a lot. They’ve had critical successes including Succession over the past couple of years. But they need a statement show to compete with their rivals.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n There are promising signs that the show will be an entertaining success. The Guardian<\/a> gave the pilot episode a positive review as they described it as “opulent and gorgeous.” Meanwhile, Entertainment Weekly said that the acting performances are strong and stand out.<\/p>\n This is crucial if they want to make fans feel as though this is unmissable TV. But many of the problems for Game of Thrones came in the critically-panned later seasons. They must gain the trust of fans who worry that they’re wasting<\/a> their time watching a show that will fall flat.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n House of the Dragon’s source material is very different from Game of Thrones. The latter came from a series of conventional novels with fully-fledged characters and dialogue. However, the new series draws from Fire & Blood, a fictional history of Westeros (via Market Watch<\/a>).<\/p>\n The writing style is very different from that of A Song of Ice and Fire. It remains to be seen how well this translates to a TV series and if fans appreciate the final product. This format gives the showrunners a lot of creative flexibility but it comes with some challenges too.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Critics are calling House of the Dragon a smarter show than its precursor. The problem with Game of Thrones is that it became ridiculous to many fans in the later seasons. Characters traveled vast distances in minutes and the less said about some storylines, the better.<\/p>\n However, the writing appears to be a lot tighter in this new series. The showrunners want to create a Shakespearian vibe as they have intense drama and powerful acting. This is very ambitious but many fans loved these traits in the original Game of Thrones (via Ranker<\/a>).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n HBO has invested a lot of money in a TV show to bring back a devoted fanbase. But they can’t rely on them to maximize their profits and must also lure a casual audience. The problem is that the new show may be confusing for less-passionate fans of Martin’s world.<\/p>\n They may wonder where Jon Snow and Daenerys are because the show is set hundreds of years earlier. Another issue is that there are long-time lapses in the new series. These didn’t occur in Game of Thrones as it followed a conventional narrative path (via The Ringer<\/a>).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n One of the most memorable aspects of the original Game of Thrones series was the opening credits. This took the form of a massive map that evolved throughout the seasons. However, House of the Dragon operates on a smaller scale than HBO’s previous project.<\/p>\n This may be advantageous because there are fewer storylines. It’s easier for fans to follow what’s going on but there’s another benefit. Scriptwriters struggled to finish the previous story<\/a> because so many things happened. It may not be so difficult with the new series (via TV Line<\/a>).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n A glaring reason why House of the Dragon may not perform as well as the previous series is that there is so much TV. We’re not even talking about the streaming wars in this case. It’s a simple truth that there is an infinite number of TV shows available for people to watch.<\/p>\n These days viewers binge-watch series and struggle to catch up with everything. Ironically, Game of Thrones changed the game because it opened the door to cinematic television. If the new series doesn’t seize viewers’ imaginations it’s easy to find something else (via Hollywood Reporter<\/a>).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n One of the best aspects of the new series is that it continues the trend of using character actors. The likes of Aidan Gillan and Conleth Hill stoles scenes in Game of Thrones. House of the Dragon will follow a similar model with Paddy Considine and Matt Smith on board (via Collider<\/a>).<\/p>\n The latter is one of Britain’s most in-demand actors. He starred in The Crown, Dr. Who, and Edgar Wright’s Last Night in Soho. Meanwhile, Considine acts, directs, and writes with glowing reviews. These men instantly bring the show’s pedigree to a higher level.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n It’s wrong to say that Martin isn’t a productive writer. The problem is that he’s working on multiple projects at the same time rather than focusing on finishing one. For example, Martin is currently adapting his Wild Card series as well as writing The Winds of Winter (via Daily Express<\/a>).<\/p>\n Fans doubt that he’ll ever finish the latter and some think that he doesn’t want to. Furthermore, Martin says he plans a sequel to Fire & Blood. But his publishers don’t want this until he finishes the original saga. This leaves the new series facing the same problems as the original Game of Thrones.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n We’ve spoken about the historical aspect of the new series compared to the previous Game of Thrones adaptation. The best part of this is that it provides unique flexibility. They may choose to expand on specific characters and fill in the gaps. This could be one of the best parts of the story because fans learn more about them.<\/p>\n Sometimes the source material can be a poisoned chalice because not everything works well on TV. This book provides a more bare-bones narrative than the conventional dialogue-driven A Song of Ice and Fire. Fire & Blood isn’t as good as the original books but this may be better for the new series (via Entertainment Weekly<\/a>).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Most of the immediate critical responses to the new series were positive but they weren’t unanimous. The Irish Independent described House of the Dragon as “bloated, charmless and dull.” The Daily Beast<\/a> was even more damning as they called it a “dull Game of Thrones do-over.”<\/p>\n Meanwhile, some Redditors considered the show’s characters to be uninspiring and struggled to care about them. This is a polarizing show that has already split its audience. There is a lot of brutality in the show but many viewers don’t care enough about the affected characters. <\/p>\n The storylines in this new series are more streamlined and specific than in Game of Thrones. This is great because some of the latter’s dragged on and infuriated viewers. It’s better not to think about how long it took Dany to arrive in Westeros (via Vanity Fair<\/a>).<\/p>\n Then there were appalling wastes of time like the Dorne saga and Bran’s journey. The only word to describe them was boring and this show can’t afford<\/a> the same. Hopefully, they can be more specific about the storylines they choose to use instead of trying to include everything.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n House of the Dragon differs from Game of Thrones because it features multiple timelines. This didn’t happen in the latter as fans watched child actors grow to adulthood before their eyes. However, the story leaps forward in the new series and a new cast replaces the younger actors.<\/p>\n This is slightly unfortunate because fans lose the connection they built up. It’s jarring to see somebody else play the same character. Furthermore, it may be slightly confusing to understand that several years have passed by. This is a major risk that HBO is taking but it may pay off (via Men’s Health<\/a>).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Success became the worst enemy of the original Game of Thrones series. That may seem ridiculous but several cast members became too big for the show. The likes of Emilia Clarke, Kit Harrington, and Richard Madden are all household names now (via The Guardian<\/a>).<\/p>\n Even D.B. Weiss and David Benioff ran out of patience with the show. They signed a deal to create a new Star Wars trilogy and Game of Thrones instantly deteriorated. Ironically they lost their new gig as a result. But HBO must ensure this doesn’t happen with their new series and cast.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n There are 17 dragons in the new series and this may appear to be a good thing. However, too much of something reduces the overall impact. The original Game of Thrones show had a tight budget and this influenced the different directors (via Looper<\/a>).<\/p>\n They were very selective about the moments they used the three dragons or CGI set pieces. There’s a danger that fans won’t care as much about House of the Dragon because it looks more like a video game. The show won’t shock them as much because it’s more in their face.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Viewers know what dragons look like in the Game of Thrones universe. Adding more won’t make it more exciting because less can be more. Fans rarely saw the dragons in the original series and this made it more special when they were featured (via Elite Daily<\/a>).<\/p>\n They may feel the same about other elements of the new show including locations. There will be a sense of comfort and sentimental enjoyment because they see them again. But there is less scope for a fresh look at Westeros and this may be a problem for House of the Dragon.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Fans illegally downloaded Game of Thrones over one billion times through its entire run. Evidence revealed that they also used nefarious means to secure 54 million downloads of the new series. In short, this means that HBO is losing a staggering amount of money<\/a>.<\/p>\n The problem is that there are so many streaming platforms that it’s impossible to pay for everything. Fans don’t want to miss<\/a> out on a cultural moment so they’re going to obtain it illegally. It may not be right but it’s the reality of the world and HBO will pay the price (via Mashable<\/a>).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Some shows are too big to miss because they create a cultural moment. Game of Thrones brought more people together during parties than a bottle of liquor. Meanwhile, the likes of Stranger Things and Breaking Bad became must-watch television (via Indie Gala<\/a>).<\/p>\n HBO hopes that House of the Dragon will feel too big to miss. The problem is that fans know what to expect now and have big demands. Game of Thrones came out of nowhere and became a cultural phenomenon. The new series must prove itself before it can become the same.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Later Game of Thrones episodes faced recurring complaints about being too dark. No, we’re not talking about the content but rather the visuals. The Battle of Winterfell in Season Eight bore most of the criticism because it wasn’t easy for fans to watch (via CNET<\/a>).<\/p>\n House of the Dragon is enduring similar comments<\/a> because some scenes have poor lighting. Show cinematographer Fabien Wagner threw shade at fans because he thinks they can’t tune their TVs. Surprisingly not everybody wants to stand up and change the settings every 10 minutes.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Some critics say that the new series isn’t as fun or as enjoyable as GOT. The original show instantly seized the imaginations of fans but House of the Dragon isn’t the same. There is a positive to this because it allows the latter to stand apart. In hindsight, this may work in its favor.<\/p>\n After all, Better Call Saul had a slower pace than Breaking Bad but remains a critical darling. The issue is that many people said that House of the Dragon isn’t fun and that’s a bigger problem. Nobody likes watching something that takes itself too seriously (via Wion News<\/a>).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n HBO has supreme confidence in its new series and believes that it will be a success. If there was any doubt, they quashed this after the first episode. The network instantly renewed the show for a second season after 20 million people tuned into Episode One (via Hollywood Reporter<\/a>).<\/p>\n However, some people think<\/a> that this is a step that they’ll regret. Many people were curious about the new show but it disappointed them. Nonetheless, HBO is backing its showrunners and committing to another season. They pray that it will be a financial success<\/a> regardless of critical acclaim.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The scale of the conflict in House of the Dragon is smaller than in Game of Thrones. This may feel anti-climatic to some viewers because the stakes aren’t as high. The latter dealt with the potential end of the world as the Night King attempted to destroy humanity. It’s difficult to compete with that.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, the new series has the Targaryen Civil War that almost destroyed the family. The main positive is that there will be a lot of dragon-related violence. This promises to be spectacular on-screen but the overall sense of dread won’t be there. Unfortunately, it can’t achieve the same levels of fear (via Looper<\/a>).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n It’s very difficult to make a successful prequel series but not impossible. Netflix pulled it off with Better Call Saul. This show’s events went down before those of Breaking Bad but it remained brilliant. However, it had a different tone from its predecessor and went in another direction (via Variety<\/a>).<\/p>\n Unfortunately, many prequels suffer from Star Wars syndrome. Yes, TV and movies are contrasting mediums but they share some similarities. It’s not easy to go back to a world and make fans care in the same way. Sometimes writers become lost in the lore instead of telling an entertaining story.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n HBO hoped to create a more grown-up show when they made House of the Dragon. Game of Thrones had significantly younger cast members in key roles. Fans watched them grow up before their eyes for over a decade. This won’t happen in the new series.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, dialogue drives this show more than the latter GOT seasons. We’ll talk later about how this may not always work. But it feels as though they want to create an atmosphere of court intrigue. This is a more grown-up style than the wildness of Game of Thrones (via Rolling Stone<\/a>).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n HBO has a problem when it comes to consistency. Game of Thrones is a case in point because it was brilliant for the first three seasons. Then the long decline began until it culminated in a disaster of a finale. However, it’s not the only sci-fi show that plummeted in quality.<\/p>\n Westworld received acclaim when it first came out but recent seasons tested the commitment of its most loyal fans. It remains to be seen if they can keep it together for a whole run or if the new series will decline too. Let’s hope that it remains brilliant to the end (via Collider<\/a>).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n These days there is a developing trend where showrunners describe their new series as longer movies. While we should hold film and TV in separate regard it’s clear where they are coming from. Increasing numbers of high-level Hollywood stars are stepping back to the small screen.<\/p>\n TV has never been more cinematic than today because of the increasing budgets. Developers know that fans don’t commit to watching a movie in one sitting. But they’ll binge-watch a series over a day or two. That’s why it must be of the highest quality possible (via The Guardian<\/a>).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Whenever something is successful there’s a clamor to find the next one. We’ve seen it with Harry Potter, Twilight, Stranger Things, and many other franchises. Now HBO hopes to share the next Game of Thrones by committing to a new series in this universe.<\/p>\n However, the problem is that knock-offs are rarely successful because the moment passes. There was a reason why it worked at a moment in time and became a phenomenon. It’s very difficult to replicate this and grab the attention of fans again (via Vox<\/a>).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n At times it felt as though a child wrote the first episode of House of the Dragon. HBO poured millions of dollars<\/a> into the episode because of the effects and the costumes. But the dialogue left a lot to be desired and the character development was poor.<\/p>\n Daemon Targaryen will be one of the most important characters but his development was bleak. He went from brutally decapitating a criminal to ridiculously competing in a tourney. Time will tell if the character development improves but many critics despaired (via Mic<\/a>).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Many literary critics consider Fire & Blood to be Martin’s worst book from a technical perspective. They recognize that the author had fun when he was writing it because it expanded the history of his fictional universe. But they also thought that it wasn’t very good.<\/p>\nMartin Sold Out<\/h2>\n
Weak Marketing<\/h2>\n
Event TV<\/h2>\n
HBO Is Heavily Invested<\/h2>\n
Promising Signs<\/h2>\n
Creative Differences<\/h2>\n
Smarter Show<\/h2>\n
Confusing for Casuals<\/h2>\n
Smaller Scale<\/h2>\n
Too Much TV<\/h2>\n
Character Actors<\/h2>\n
Where is Book Two?<\/h2>\n
Flexible Narrative<\/h2>\n
A Little Boring<\/h2>\n
Specific Storylines<\/h2>\n
Inconsistent Timelines<\/h2>\n
Stepping Stone<\/h2>\n
Too Much CGI<\/h2>\n
Fewer Surprises<\/h2>\n
Illegal Downloads<\/h2>\n
Cultural Epoch<\/h2>\n
Murky Scenes<\/h2>\n
Less Fun<\/h2>\n
<\/h2>\n
Renewal<\/h2>\n
Civil War vs. World War<\/h2>\n
Star Wars Hangover<\/h2>\n
More Grown-Up<\/h2>\n
Long Decline<\/h2>\n
Cinematic Television<\/h2>\n
Moment Has Past<\/h2>\n
Poor Character Development<\/h2>\n
Martin’s Worst Book<\/h2>\n